In WoW i played a druid, but i only thought they were ok. I liked pallies and hunters the most. I dont really want to do ALL melee either, so from that, whats the best pvp class thats not all melee? (I'd like to be on Destruction Side)What Class should I be in Warhammer: Age of Reckoning?
Hmm, on destruction I'd recommend witch elf or (I believe the name is) disciple of Khaine. They offer some varied combat. Order has more of the comparable roles to those in WoW, and I haven't played to heavily with Destruction yet, but if you do end up going order then the elven shadow hunter or white lion might be your thing.
Okay, I've looked up the class names again. Here goes.
If you like hunters, then the Squig Herder will be your thing, I've fought against these guys and they are resilient little buggers with a lot of variety in tactics. The Chaos zealot is another possibility for varied range combat, though they seem more pigeonholed for their lack of armor.
Disciple of Khaine and Witch elves are also similar to druids/hunters.
Friday, March 9, 2012
Will their be a Day of Reckoning 3 on the Wii?
If not than what about any other wwe games Plus is the Wii fun or a waste of money? I might buy it. Right now, PS3 is too expensive.Will their be a Day of Reckoning 3 on the Wii?
i dont think so that day of reconing is coming out. u should get smackdown vs raw 2007. the Wii is fun but it is a waste of money.Will their be a Day of Reckoning 3 on the Wii?
It's a licensing thing right now, but there will be a WWE game eventually. It's just a time issue. The license for the WWE games are a bit harder to get ahold of, due to the characters.Will their be a Day of Reckoning 3 on the Wii?
i tink dat da wii is not a waste of damn duckets u should do wat im doin wait 4 da ps3 2 go 2 a lower price. and i do tink dat there should b a day of reckoning 3 4 da wii and nintedo gamecube.
i dont think so that day of reconing is coming out. u should get smackdown vs raw 2007. the Wii is fun but it is a waste of money.Will their be a Day of Reckoning 3 on the Wii?
It's a licensing thing right now, but there will be a WWE game eventually. It's just a time issue. The license for the WWE games are a bit harder to get ahold of, due to the characters.Will their be a Day of Reckoning 3 on the Wii?
i tink dat da wii is not a waste of damn duckets u should do wat im doin wait 4 da ps3 2 go 2 a lower price. and i do tink dat there should b a day of reckoning 3 4 da wii and nintedo gamecube.
At what rate will the intrest on 400 naira increase to 24 naira in 3 years reckoning in simple intrest?
dkAt what rate will the intrest on 400 naira increase to 24 naira in 3 years reckoning in simple intrest?
7% calculated on an annual basis should increase the ratio by 3 naira per day equalling a sheckel zippa do by end of the year.
7% calculated on an annual basis should increase the ratio by 3 naira per day equalling a sheckel zippa do by end of the year.
Why are some people comparing Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning to Skyrim?
just read both walkthroughs and decide for yourself which is better
walkthrough for Skyrim:
http://www.rarityguide.com/articles/arti鈥?/a>
walkthrough for KOA Reckoning
http://www.rarityguide.com/articles/arti鈥?/a>Why are some people comparing Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning to Skyrim?
Every game is always being compared to the current 'king' of the genre. All MMOs have to measure up to WoW, all multiplayer shooters have to be compared to BF3/MW3/CSS.
It also helps. I mean if you are using something that is familiar to a lot of people you have it easier to point out differences.Why are some people comparing Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning to Skyrim?
only because skyrim happens to be an EXTREMELY successful and good rpg and kingdoms of Amalur is also an rpg. no other reasonWhy are some people comparing Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning to Skyrim?
As far as I know several people worked on both projects.
walkthrough for Skyrim:
http://www.rarityguide.com/articles/arti鈥?/a>
walkthrough for KOA Reckoning
http://www.rarityguide.com/articles/arti鈥?/a>Why are some people comparing Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning to Skyrim?
Every game is always being compared to the current 'king' of the genre. All MMOs have to measure up to WoW, all multiplayer shooters have to be compared to BF3/MW3/CSS.
It also helps. I mean if you are using something that is familiar to a lot of people you have it easier to point out differences.Why are some people comparing Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning to Skyrim?
only because skyrim happens to be an EXTREMELY successful and good rpg and kingdoms of Amalur is also an rpg. no other reasonWhy are some people comparing Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning to Skyrim?
As far as I know several people worked on both projects.
How could a snake with legs tempt Adam and Eve 6,000 years ago, by Christian reckoning?
How could a snake with legs tempt Adam and Even in the Garden of Eden 6,000 years ago, according to creationists, when modern science shows the snake lost its legs through evolution 92 million to 150 million years ago?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7339508.stmHow could a snake with legs tempt Adam and Eve 6,000 years ago, by Christian reckoning?
All modern science is wrong. EVERYBODY knows that. Evolution isn't real, the world is not 4.5 billion years old, Jesus rode dinosaurs, the Sun revolves around us and not vice versa, the universe did not come to be by means of the big bang, thousands of years ago people could live hundreds and hundreds of years, there was a flood a long time ago that covered the entire world, people can come back to life and the earth is flat. Duh.
"A snake with legs" is a euphemism. ;0)How could a snake with legs tempt Adam and Eve 6,000 years ago, by Christian reckoning?
You do know these people deny evolution, right?
im not a christian but i think the snake was the devil
its an allagoryHow could a snake with legs tempt Adam and Eve 6,000 years ago, by Christian reckoning?
Prove the serpent had legs.
Because there is a vast scientific conspiracy to withhold from everyone the true age of the earth, obviously.
scripture never said the serpent had legs, it simply says that it would slither on its belly for eternity.
I think that means its chances for evolution were pinched.
Get a life Skippy!
Splitting Hairs.
The Single Cell is only explained .... God made it!
Romans 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Maranatha
AA Said: Creationist deny Evolution
Bill Said: No we don't what we deny is .... the change of one species into another!
No MORF
No half men!
You can breed a Donkey to a Horse but the Mule can not have offspring. The seed is different.
Gen 1:11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit
****after
his kind,
whose seed is in itself
(DNA)
, upon the earth: and it was so.
Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
Simply put but true...............
Gen 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
AFTER HIS KIND the DNA tells the Single Cell How to make The different kind of Beasts.
Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
God made Man different that the rest of creation!
Man is in charge of everything just like it says.
Whats your problem!
Answer you want your SIN!
Rom 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Rom 1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Rom 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
Rom 1:23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
Rom 1:24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
Rom 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Maranatha
I believe in both the bible and evolution. And it was the serpent, the devil. Legs aren't mentioned in the bible account I am familiar with. In a way, I am happy for you that you have had such an uncomplicated life, that you have had both the time to devote to questioning things so extensively, and the ease to not need hope during difficult times. My pain, which is extensive, and not open for discussion, causes me to need hope. No logic, or insults, will change that.
Shut up Michael
Actually the word used was "serpent". A serpent in the Biblical case that was also called a "wild beast of the field". This serpent planted the idea in Eve that she and Adam could know good from bad and be just like God being able to rule themselves while living forever. No doubt Satan (being a spirit being) used this serpent to talk through to Eve. Biblically there have been other instances where animals were demon possessed in the Old Testament (not unusual).raw food battlefield
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7339508.stmHow could a snake with legs tempt Adam and Eve 6,000 years ago, by Christian reckoning?
All modern science is wrong. EVERYBODY knows that. Evolution isn't real, the world is not 4.5 billion years old, Jesus rode dinosaurs, the Sun revolves around us and not vice versa, the universe did not come to be by means of the big bang, thousands of years ago people could live hundreds and hundreds of years, there was a flood a long time ago that covered the entire world, people can come back to life and the earth is flat. Duh.
"A snake with legs" is a euphemism. ;0)How could a snake with legs tempt Adam and Eve 6,000 years ago, by Christian reckoning?
You do know these people deny evolution, right?
im not a christian but i think the snake was the devil
its an allagoryHow could a snake with legs tempt Adam and Eve 6,000 years ago, by Christian reckoning?
Prove the serpent had legs.
Because there is a vast scientific conspiracy to withhold from everyone the true age of the earth, obviously.
scripture never said the serpent had legs, it simply says that it would slither on its belly for eternity.
I think that means its chances for evolution were pinched.
Get a life Skippy!
Splitting Hairs.
The Single Cell is only explained .... God made it!
Romans 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Maranatha
AA Said: Creationist deny Evolution
Bill Said: No we don't what we deny is .... the change of one species into another!
No MORF
No half men!
You can breed a Donkey to a Horse but the Mule can not have offspring. The seed is different.
Gen 1:11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit
****after
his kind,
whose seed is in itself
(DNA)
, upon the earth: and it was so.
Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
Simply put but true...............
Gen 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
AFTER HIS KIND the DNA tells the Single Cell How to make The different kind of Beasts.
Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
God made Man different that the rest of creation!
Man is in charge of everything just like it says.
Whats your problem!
Answer you want your SIN!
Rom 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Rom 1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Rom 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
Rom 1:23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
Rom 1:24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
Rom 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Maranatha
I believe in both the bible and evolution. And it was the serpent, the devil. Legs aren't mentioned in the bible account I am familiar with. In a way, I am happy for you that you have had such an uncomplicated life, that you have had both the time to devote to questioning things so extensively, and the ease to not need hope during difficult times. My pain, which is extensive, and not open for discussion, causes me to need hope. No logic, or insults, will change that.
Shut up Michael
Actually the word used was "serpent". A serpent in the Biblical case that was also called a "wild beast of the field". This serpent planted the idea in Eve that she and Adam could know good from bad and be just like God being able to rule themselves while living forever. No doubt Satan (being a spirit being) used this serpent to talk through to Eve. Biblically there have been other instances where animals were demon possessed in the Old Testament (not unusual).
Is Kingdoms Of Amalur: Reckoning LEAKED Over the Internet ?
it is leaked ?Is Kingdoms Of Amalur: Reckoning LEAKED Over the Internet ?
get your self a job and buy itIs Kingdoms Of Amalur: Reckoning LEAKED Over the Internet ?
its leaked....
download from here!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4mhet_Xwxk
get your self a job and buy itIs Kingdoms Of Amalur: Reckoning LEAKED Over the Internet ?
its leaked....
download from here!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4mhet_Xwxk
Will my 13in macbook pro play kingdoms of amalur reckoning?
i just bought my macbook pro 13 inch about a week ago. i bought the 1200 dollar one. all i want to know is if my computer can handle running kingdoms of amalur: reckoning, and or skyrim. i will of course be playing it on windows 7 via bootcampWill my 13in macbook pro play kingdoms of amalur reckoning?
Yes, your laptop will play that game since it seems to run that game successfully [if the specs are at the min requirements!]
Good luck!
Yes, your laptop will play that game since it seems to run that game successfully [if the specs are at the min requirements!]
Good luck!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)